Loading...
Validation readouts. CTCAE v6.0 explainers. Architectural deep-dives. The conversations we have with research directors, safety medical officers, and the regulators who review our work, published.
FeaturedProduct Updates · 3 min read
Coordinators spend a surprising amount of time moving data between systems and resolving grading disagreements one at a time. This week we collapsed both of those flows, and we doubled the vocabulary the synonym mapper recognizes.
Long-form essays on the engine architecture, validation readouts, industry analysis, and the archive of Clinical Intelligence Weekly. Most readers subscribe to the newsletter; everything also lives here.
CTCAE grading accuracy depends on context. A peripheral neuropathy finding means something different in a patient with Type 2 Diabetes than in a patient without prior neurological history. This week we shipped four capabilities that bring the right clinical context into the grading workflow.
Coordinators spend significant time moving data between clinical systems and recovering from interruptions. This week we closed three of those gaps end-to-end: direct patient import, workflow resumption, and automatic alerting on high-grade self-reports.
Clinical trial sites need their tools to work together. This week we closed the loop with the electronic health record. Coordinators authenticate with their existing clinical credentials, and patient demographics, encounters, observations, and conditions flow directly into the grading workflow.
Quality programs are only as serious as their handling of disagreement. This week we shipped end-to-end adjudication for the cases where independent raters do not agree, brought real-time grading analytics into the operational view, and removed a feature that lacked the clinical context to be safe.
Quality assurance in CTCAE grading has always required showing your work. This week we shipped the infrastructure: blind grading sessions, designated grader roles, and grade definitions one click from every grading form.
Patient safety is a patient-level question, not an encounter-level one. This week we consolidated the longitudinal view, made the encounter-level review action explicit, and unified the substrate so the same data flows through web and mobile identically.
Clinical environments are unpredictable. Networks drop, devices reboot, apps crash mid-recording. This week we made the platform resilient to all of that, and added a one-click export for the moments when audit visits come without warning.
Oncology patients arrive with multiple adverse events per visit, not one. This week we changed the grading shape from one-event-per-page to a single composable session, and we brought the inter-rater statistics regulators ask for directly into the platform.
Clinical trial coordinators do not spend their entire day at a workstation. This week's release brings the grading workflow to wherever the patient encounter happens, and rebuilds authentication to survive the realities of clinical interruption.